this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
259 points (97.4% liked)
Rust
6005 readers
5 users here now
Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.
Wormhole
Credits
- The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just pointing out that the pawb.social people are/were also planning on forking Lemmy for similar reasons: https://pawb.social/post/147036 . Not entirely sure how much work has gone into it, but might be worth syncing up with them. Although I'm not sure if it's the "right" thing to do to fork just for ideological reasons, especially since the main lemmy.ml instance seems to be fairly neutral.
I've been thinking about how a single "community" could exist across multiple instances, especially given that the landscape right now is that communities are basically:
Communities following others seems an elegant solution, honestly. Although, I would say that moderators should be able to remove posts of communities they follow, just in case.
However, something stuck out to me when reading the design discussion:
Why not? The lemmy web client at least does a good job at de-duplicating crossposts, and the client used for posting could give you a bullet list of communities you want to send it to. Imagine instances
a
,b
andc
wherea
defederatesc
, buta
also has the largest community for bespoke hatwear or whatever. If you (who is on none of those instances) send your post to justa
(because it's the largest), then your content will be unavailable toc
. But if you post to botha
andc
, you reach both communities.Another thing that confused me while trying to wrap my head around things is this diagram, which I don't think covers a common case:
If a user on
b
makes a post1
to the community onc
... What happens?Option 1:
funny@c
boosts post1
as message2
.funny@b
is sent2
and boosts post1
as message3
.user2@a
can see1
through message3
because it is posted onb
, which they federate with.Option 2:
funny@c
boosts post1
as message2
.funny@b
is sent2
and boosts post2
as message3
.user2@a
cannot see2
through message3
because2
is onc
which they do not federate with.How is communities undiscoverable? There are services for this https://lemmyverse.net/communities , of course it would be nice to have that more integrated in to Lemmy, but it is still there.
Okay, maybe "undiscoverable" is kind of the wrong word. I'm thinking about users who don't really understand how lemmy work and don't know that these tools are available.
During the initial "gold rush", I noticed a lot of duplicate communities being created on lemmy.world that already existed elsewhere (e.g. !opossums@lemmy.world for !possums@possumpat.io ). These communities I guess just didn't appear during a search on lemmy.world (since it didn't know about it).
Honestly, it felt like if you made a community anywhere other than lemmy.world, a lemmy.world version would appear and outcompete it unless you linked it elsewhere or it had a dedicated instance.
Not saying that anyone did anything wrong, it's just people being unfamiliar with the platform.
Well, duplicate communities might also be on purpose, to lessen centralization. I see many that try to migrate away from lemmy.ml, and this community is one of them. I agree that it might be a bit confusing, but it is easily worked around by subscribing to both communities.
Thanks for the tip! I’ll reach out to them.