this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
97 points (90.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9663 readers
339 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (8 children)

I'm going to inject some unpopular nuance here, so I'll preface by admitting that I haven't looked further into this event than the information provided in the linked article, which isn't much. Nevertheless, a few points:

No system is perfect, including exclusively human drivers. Obviously zero accidents is ideal, but as you said, road ragin' car-brained behavior is typical. How many people are killed every year by human drivers?

Obviously driverless system development should aspire to dynamic reactivity comparable to the best human driver. But when running a cost-benefit analysis for driverless adoption it's worth considering if, normalizing each by their respective total hours-on-the-road, the mistakes made by driverless cars due to rigid adhesion to traffic laws outnumber the mistakes made by drivers due to their own flagrant disobedience.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

How do you intend to inject nuance of all things when you haven't even bothered to read the article. Honestly.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Uh, I did read the article.

I haven't looked further into this event than the information provided in the linked article, which isn't much.

[–] LordTrychon@startrek.website 5 points 4 months ago

Hold on now... you can't expect everyone to just read your whole comment...

load more comments (5 replies)