Because while euthanasia is generally a good thing, there are also big potentials for abuse and unnecessary tragedy. We maintain a pretense of caring about these things with humans and so most governments err on the side of caution while others think they're such hot shit they can dance their way through the quagmire. Meanwhile, we openly don't give a single fuck what happens to non-human animals, and our culture is predicated on treating them like objects, so you're allowed to do whatever you want with them. Kill them because they're suffering, kill them because they bark too loud, it's all the same. It's your dog-shaped object, go nuts.
jerkface
They also didn't count the water required to manufacture the car. You might argue that a strict usage analysis doesn't cover full lifecycle, but clearly this wasn't intended to be lifecycle analysis for either case, so it still compares meaningfully.
... once usage rates explode to many times the current level
I haven't had anyone to take care of me since the 90s and honestly, most stuff just doesn't get done.
killing extra children
go break your toys kid
Any time you deal with Amazon, you're either getting fucked, fucking over someone else, or both. That's their whole business model, taking advantage of people! Just don't.
Pretty cool.
Is it.
I'm still looking pretty good, actually. I see my peers and I panic, they all look like old men and women.
In 2 years, I'll be older than my oldest known ancestor made it. I'm not that old. I think about it every day. The point of life isn't being happy or comfortable, it's finding and creating meaning.
ha ha okay