this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
103 points (99.0% liked)

Work Reform

9976 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] domdanial@reddthat.com 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

"an employee making less than the new threshold who doesn’t manage anyone else, whose job doesn’t require them to exercise “independent judgment with respect to matters of significance,” according to DOL, and whose job doesn’t require advanced knowledge might qualify for overtime pay."

The limit used to be people making under like, 100k, and now the limit is like, 130k or something. How many people making between 100k and 130k have jobs that are not management and don't require independent judgment with respect to matters of significance?

Feels pretty niche to me, but I guess progress is good. I'm also wondering how many people in these positions don't have significant bargaining power., as the article states this law is for those people.

Edit: Ah re-read it: it also impacts those in the 30-40k range, bumping the threshold up significantly.

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

And in the 100-130k range, you're looking at a lot of IT/tech folk.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's very common for companies to slap the word manager into a title to exploit this loophole. Adjusting the threshold at the lower levels is going to do a lot of good. As long as a Trump doesn't get to reverse it again.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Your not a technician, you're an "engineer". Ignore the fact you will make zero engineering decisions on this.