this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
125 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59323 readers
4559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Sovereignity by ditching open source software for a proprietary solution made by a US company?

SAP is German.

Does Scholz really expect someone checking it thoroughly, each time?

Let's not pretend that people do this with open source software either. Especially obfuscated mechanisms might not even be seen by the few people who do check it.

[–] raef@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Probably referring to Microsoft. That's the one of the two with all the cloud experience

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm aware you can intentionally try to make source code unreadable and making open source software effectively proprietary but I do not know of any examples of people doing that. Do you?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They meant backdoors hidden in plain sight, so making it readable, but (EDIT: seemingly) innocent. People do that.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

People notice the oddest things, look at the xz malware incident. All because some guy figured a decompression subroutine in his software was taking a bit longer than expected.