Privacy

31981 readers

485 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

502

Firefox added ad tracking and has already turned it on without asking you (mastodon.social)

submitted 4 months ago by azdle@news.idlestate.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

196 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

More nonsense.

Is everything you put up to address my comment.

I did use a text browser. But you apparently fail their purpose. I pipe <html/> into it so that I can't be fooled by such propaganda-spitting guys.. (...).

... fascist platforms that aren't ...

You implied bad about me, so I reason this post with that.

... changing your useragent ...

Sounds harder than triggering a flag for a feature which aims at serving you, the user.

Your next sentence, minus the next propaganda, makes me wonder:

This is pointless hypothetical FUD with little existing precedence (...) so you can find a way to not hold Mozilla accountable for being a shit platform that's supporting ad culture again.

By "This" you mean the topic? I already prompted you my point of view; You didn't address it. You falsely accuse Mozilla of pushing advertisements down ones throat. Obv. wrong. This undermines my point which I made in order to aid your shortcomings I saw.

[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You implied bad about me, so I reason this post with that.

Not at all. I was referring to Xshitter and Facebook. I wasn't trying to imply you were a fascist. Sorry if it seemed that way.

Sounds harder than triggering a flag for a feature which aims at serving you, the user.

Clarify?

You falsely accuse Mozilla of pushing advertisements down ones throat.

My argument in this thread was that Mozilla is supporting ad culture, though I suppose serving targeted ads regardless of anonymity can still be considered "pushing advertisements down ones throat". Regardless, pocket already exists to push ads down my throat, should I wish it to ;)

[–] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

Clarify?

You suggested that one can change user agents, once (and here is room for debate) firefox is not working properly. At least this is what I carry around from our convo!

Regardless,

Yeah, because you still managed to propagate assumptions which may be hard to reason about objectively.

pocket already exists to push ads down my throat, should I wish it to ;)

That's about available sources. But I agree that just 5% of articles within their topics do not force cookies. If Mozilla would reside in the EU Pocket would have much higher quality (since I think to recall these sources are hand picked).