this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
105 points (97.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60789 readers
388 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
105
What do you prefer to selfhost? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by erev@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been around selfhosting most of my life and have seen a variety of different setups and reasons for selfhosting. For myself, I don't really self host as mant services for myself as I do infrastructure. I like to build out the things that are usually invisible to people. I host some stuff that's relatively visible, but most of my time is spent building an over engineered backbone for all the services I could theoretically host. For instance, full domain authentication and oversight with kerberized network storage, and both internal and public DNS.

The actual services I host? Mail and vaultwarden, with a few (i.e. < 3) more to come.

I absolutely do not need the level of infrastructure I need, but I honestly prefer that to the majority of possible things I could host. That's the fun stuff to me; the meat and potatoes. But I know some people do focus more on the actual useful services they can host, or on achieving specific things with their self hosting. What types of things do you host and why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

pihole, in front of my own DNS, because it's easier to have them to domain filtering.

mythtv/kodi, because I'd rather buy DVDs than stream; rather stream than pirate; but still like to watch the local news.

LAMP stack, because I like watching some local sensor data, including fitness equipment, and it's a convenient place to keep recipes and links to things I buy regularly but rarely (like furnace filters).

Homeassistant, because they already have interfaces to some sensors that I didn't want to sort out, and it's useful to have some lights on timers.

I also host, internally, a fake version of quicken.com, because it lets me update stock quotes in Quicken2012 and has saved me having to upgrade or learn a new platform.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Do you have any input on whether running your Pi-Hole as your DNS service versus how you have it, with pi-hole in front of a standalone DNS server, as to which is functionally "more better?"

I had been toying with making my pi-hole into a full DNS server using Unbound, but I had been debating if it would be better to have that service running seperately.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have isc-bind running behind pihole so network clients can register their own hostnames, and as near as I can tell, that's outside the scope of pihole's DHCP and dnsmasq. Pihole alone is probably fine if you only want to name static hosts, but (I understand) Unbound doesn't support ddns, either.

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Unbound will take updates via API. You could either write exit hooks on your clients, or use the "on commit" event on isc-dhcp-server to construct parameters and execute a script when a new lease is handed out.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Unbound is incredibly lightweight. There’s no reason not to just have it running on the same box as your pihole.