this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
503 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court has agreed to halt the reinstatement of net neutrality rules until August 5th, while the court considers whether more permanent action is justified.

It’s the latest setback in a long back and forth on net neutrality — the principle that internet service providers (ISPs) should not be able to block or throttle internet traffic in a discriminatory manner.

The current FCC, which has three Democratic and two Republican commissioners, voted in April to bring back net neutrality. The 3–2 vote was divided along party lines.

Broadband providers have since challenged the FCC’s action, which is potentially more vulnerable after the Supreme Court’s recent decision to strike down Chevron deference — a legal doctrine that instructed courts to defer to an agency’s expert decisions except in a very narrow range of circumstances.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Matt Schettenhelm said in a report prior to the court’s ruling that he doesn’t expect the FCC to prevail in court, in large part due to the demise of Chevron.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah random guy on the internet, justify yourself

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not what I asked them to do. I disagree with free markets, but that doesn't mean I'm resistant to learning from other people's perspectives.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I didn't mean you were, that just sounded strangely judgemental for a question asked to a random person on the internet who you probably never saw before and will most likely ignore it

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

I get it, but maybe they won't. They definitely will ignore my question if I never ask!