Selfhosted

60426 readers

237 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

nut_webgui v0.3.1, Light-weight NUT web GUI (github.com)

submitted 2 years ago by SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I want to share a self-hosted tool I developed. It's a NUT monitoring tool similar to webNUT but it has some additional features like:

UPS command support to remotely tell your UPS beeper to shut up.
Supports some uncommon and old devices like ARMv6, ARMv7 and RISC-V64.
It's actually light-weight, ~7MiB image size and very low memory footprint.

If anyone looking a tool like this, repo is available at https://github.com/SuperioOne/nut_webgui

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Biggest difference is being able to execute INSTCMD commands, at least that was the main reason why I developed my own tool. Another less important differences are: older ARM support and since it's written in Rust, it's much more efficient in terms of resource usage. TBH, being that efficient only makes sense for very low-power devices.

Besides that, I don't think you can go wrong with either project.

[–] rjc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the reply, sounds compelling. I'm running peanut currently and have been happy with it, but I might power out down and give this a spin. Low resource usage sounds like a nice selling point.

Thanks for your contribution!