this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37712 readers
174 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
100% but I believe these are typically locked down to one domain, and in this case its not.
At least thats how I understand it. So I guess the article is a little misleading in that sense, but the net effect is the same. You have carte blanche access to the web, via android system webview, thats acting as a de-facto out-of-band browser. So its misconfigured or not locked down, which means you can use it effectively as a "hidden" browser.
ASW isn't locked down to any domains though, it's just a basic browser, one that typically doesn't let you type in a url to go to any other domains. It's not locked down, you're just limited in how you can navigate.
What happened here is someone managed to navigate from one page to another page and then another, in order to ultimately get to google.com and search for whatever page they wanted. The initial web pages presented linked outside of what it maybe should have.
Whether ASW should be under parental controls is another matter. Apparently it isn't (at least not parental controls that affect only installed browser apps) but that could have valid functional reasons behind it.