this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
1116 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
43
Would Trump privatize weather forecasting? What to know. (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived copy of the article: ghostarchive.org

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] memfree@beehaw.org 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Would Trump? Probably. Would Project 2025? Absolutely.

Per WaPo, Project 2025....

... calls for breaking up NOAA, whose climate research it calls “harmful to future U.S. prosperity.” It suggests the Weather Service should “fully commercialize its forecasting operations,” because its data is already used widely by private companies.

The report bases that proposal on an assertion that “forecasts and warnings provided by the private companies are more reliable than those provided by the NWS.”

... as if those forecasts didn't start with the government service and then build on it. And how much more would everything cost when everyone has to pay for weather information? Food? Planes? Fish?

Remember the AccuWeather issues in Trump's first term?

Lastly: do you want to HOPE that some private company has enough customers in your area for them to make your forecast? Maybe it is insurance companies worrying about tornadoes, but your area is a mix of several firms (Allstate, Gieco, State Farm, whomever) and they all concentrate their forecast for the regions they dominate.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Would Trump? Probably. Would Project 2025? Absolutely.

Despite his denials, there's no difference.