229
Kamala Harris' opening argument: Vote for me and I'll decimate Project 2025
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
229 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10179 readers
531 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not to be a pedant but I would like it if more than 1/10 of Project 2025 got shut down
I have a slight suspicion that you did intend to be a pedant.
Business Insider's word choice, not VP Harris.
I don't think that's pedantic whatsoever in this context. Words matter from politicians, especially when they have teams of speechwriters, and she's not exactly Ms. Progressive. She's promised to fight against 10% of it, and it's totally valid to want her to clarify her intent.
Y’all know decimate was the headline and this was the actual statement, right?
Regardless, the "pedantic" argument against the headline is only a thing if you're not allowing for the evolution of language, it's actually just being a snooty language snob given that language does evolve and the usage of the headline aligns with common standards these days:
See also definition 3b of the same source.
Well I do now thank you!
When you look at her voting record in the Senate, she's fairly progressive (as far as US politics goes). IIRC, she's a little to the right of Sanders, and a little to the left of Warren, but pretty close overall to both of them. That said, she's more of a pragmatist, and Sanders is an idealist.
Hopefully she can centimate it….