this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
431 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
2821 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (5 children)

So what's the catch? Is it the price?

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

FTA:

Apparently, they are also rather expensive to produce, since it warns that they will first go into the "super premium" EV segment of luxury electric cars that can cover more than 600 miles on a charge.

So yes. Expensive initially.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] aviationeast@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Don't fly your car with the Samsung battery.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

You’d be shocked to know how many of your non-Samsung devices are using Samsung batteries.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 months ago

Basically, yes. The big issue with solid state batteries is figuring out how to mass produce them at a price where someone will actually buy them.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The whole point of a solid state battery is that they don't do that.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

Actually the risk of that should be lower