this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
456 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
2839 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) easily passed the Senate today despite critics' concerns that the bill may risk creating more harm than good for kids and perhaps censor speech for online users of all ages if it's signed into law.

KOSA received broad bipartisan support in the Senate, passing with a 91–3 vote alongside the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Action (COPPA) 2.0. Both laws seek to control how much data can be collected from minors, as well as regulate the platform features that could harm children's mental health.

However, while child safety advocates have heavily pressured lawmakers to pass KOSA, critics, including hundreds of kids, have continued to argue that it should be blocked.

Among them is the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which argues that "the House of Representatives must vote no on this dangerous legislation."

If not, potential risks to kids include threats to privacy (by restricting access to encryption, for example), reduced access to vital resources, and reduced access to speech that impacts everyone online, the ACLU has alleged.

The ACLU recently staged a protest of more than 300 students on Capitol Hill to oppose KOSA's passage. Attending the protest was 17-year-old Anjali Verma, who criticized lawmakers for ignoring kids who are genuinely concerned that the law would greatly limit their access to resources online.

"We live on the Internet, and we are afraid that important information we’ve accessed all our lives will no longer be available," Verma said. "We need lawmakers to listen to young people when making decisions that affect us."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 82 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Like all bills with "kids" or "children" in the name, it doesn't have anything to do with kids and everything to do with violating our rights.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 18 points 3 months ago

Yup. Same goes for anything with safety, privacy, or family in the name.

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I believe the way it’s presented makes it difficult to vote against—you don’t want to be labeled as someone who is enabling the pedos.

Seems like most legislation (in American in the past 40 or so years) is labeled to sound like a good thing, then you read it and it’s the exact opposite of what it pretends to be

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It's named as attack ad bait. "So-and-so voted against the Kids Online Safety Act" sounds bad to the uninformed voter, and there are a lot of uninformed voters.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

PATRIOT act, anyone?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

That's how these acts are labeled to trick voters like you and me, but thankfully in a representative democracy we have highly trained elected officials looking out for our values and reading the fine print so they don't get caught by these silly simple title traps. Right?