this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
1019 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
4106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] viking@infosec.pub 257 points 3 months ago (65 children)
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 months ago (6 children)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This is the first I've heard of LibreWolf. Is it compatible with Windows 7? And also, why is it good?

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 67 points 3 months ago

You really shouldn't connect windows 7 to the internet.

[–] jrgd@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago

https://librewolf.net/

A summary from its site and known technical details:

  • no telemetry by default
  • includes uBlock Origin
  • has sane privacy-respecting defaults
  • prepackages arkenfox user.js
  • relatively well-maintained fork of Firefox that keeps up with upstream
  • No major controversies AFAIK

As for Windows 7, nobody should really need to install Librewolf anyway on such a device. No device running Windows 7 should have access to the internet at this point. If you are asking about compatibility intending this use case, you have bigger problems to worry about than your choice of browser. If you just need to view HTML files graphically, even Internet Explorer or an older firefox ESR will do.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Looks like it should run on Windows.

Edit: sorry, didn't read far down enough. It's only built for Windows 10, but they recommend this?

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Main features: ... Continued support for NPAPI plugins like Silverlight, Adobe Flash and Java

Picture this in your minds eye: a Windows 7 machine running a browser with still working Flash and Java plugins, connected to the internet in 2024.

what do you see?

i see a flourishing ecosystem of worms, viruses and rootkits, all trying to be the one species to get to be the one who does the most damage to the prey species, the common user.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Sounds like an interesting experience to me. Admittedly I hadn't looked that far into it. If Win 7 is a must I'd say just go with latest Firefox.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 22 points 3 months ago

You're overreacting. Firefox knows their users. I am a huge "stan" for Firefox, but I will delete it like a time traveller if they make it impossible to ignore ads. I will salt the earth and poop on Firefox's grave and actively avoid it everywhere... However. If I'm wrong, there will be a Next Thing...

[–] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 3 months ago

Yeah I'm using Fennec, which doesn't have that. But as long as it's a flick of a switch to disable, I don't really mind. Still a million times better than manifest v3.

[–] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you use a DNS solutions you can block all the telemetry shit. Frankly FF has been phoning home in a lot of undesirable ways for many years even before this, like most browsers.

[–] pwalker@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

At least link the full article and not just the headline... smh. Here is also the follow-up article with comments from Firefox's CTO. https://www.heise.de/en/news/Firefox-defends-itself-Everything-done-right-just-poorly-communicated-9802546.html

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Not entirely true.

load more comments (58 replies)