this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
165 points (97.1% liked)

movies

1769 readers
161 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/15735604

Perhaps it’s fitting that a film about a ragtag rabble of not-so-superheroes failed to take off at the box office. But, 25 years since its release, the Ben Stiller-starring Mystery Men is worth rescuing from obscurity. That it hasn’t generated the cult following of so many other slightly under-the-radar movies of 1999 – think the cannibal horror movie Ravenous, or the Kirsten Dunst Watergate comedy Dick – feels criminal to the point of super-villainy.

The first and to date last feature film by the TV commercial director Kinka Usher, Mystery Men now seems curiously placed within the history of comic book movies. Released on 6 August 1999 in the US, it spoofed the superheroes that came before it, while anticipating – or preemptively satirising, even – the yet-to-happen superhero boom with ideas as sharp as anything seen in almost two decades of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I adore this movie. It's unabashedly weird and fun, and a fantastic satire of superhero tropes at the time.

My only significant hangup with it is the look of cultural appropriation through the Blue Rajah, but it stands just on the right side of acceptable imo thanks to a well fleshed out character and Hank Azaria's great performance.

If you haven't seen it, check it out.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He plays an Englishman, and there is a long history of Victorian Brits becoming infatuated with Indian culture. The reference is obscure, but definitely there.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. In fact (spoiler-ish warning), he plays a regular-ass American cosplaying an Englishman that's in turn cosplaying being an Indian mystic. The extra layer does a lot of work to keep it in good taste.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Hes a dude playing a dude disguised as another dude.