this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
547 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21192 readers
378 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    547
    Wine acronym (lemmy.ca)
    submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by ColdWater@lemmy.ca to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
    [–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Not really. It is just translating the Windows system API calls into Linux system API calls. It's not emulating Windows, it's an entirely different implementation that doesn't necessarily match that of Microsoft's implementation. It had it own workarounds to make buggy code work.

    You wouldn't call a Java Virtual Machine an emulator of another JVM either, they're just different implementations of the same specification.

    [–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thing is, I do kind of think of a JVM as an emulator for a processor that doesn't exist.

    WINE kind of blurs the line of a traditional emulator by having the executable run natively on the target machine's CPU, but everything it does in regards to dealing with the host OS, the display, disk access, etc, is emulated as far as I'm aware.

    A theoretical PS4 or Xbox One emulator running on x86 hardware could be just as much of an emulator as WINE is.

    [–] Gakomi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

    Yes but an emulator emulates both the CPU and GPU of the consoles and in the case of PS4 even thought the CPU is x86 the biggest difference I can think of is the GPU drivers.

    [–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

    Maybe depending on how far you take it. A CPU instruction is different from hardware to hardware, but a function signature would stay the same no matter the underlying architecture. If we want to go through that logic then an interpreter can be thought of as a form of emulator.

    [–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

    I'd call a JVM an emulator. To the end user they're the same.