this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
173 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
500 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It shouldn't be on the ISPs, it should be on the SERVICES that USE the ISPs.

I'll give you a perfect example, the Uvalde shooter.

He had been using a French social media platform called Yubo where he posted animal abuse videos and threatened to rape and murder other users.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/buffalo-uvalde-suspected-shooters-allegedly-abused-animals/story?id=84970582

He was reported to Yubo, REPEATEDLY, and Yubo did nothing.

Maybe we need to make social media companies mandatory reporters in cases like this? Rather than just ban a user wholesale, increase monitoring of them and report the account to local authorities?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the question then becomes "what happens when the services refuse". Because the next step up is getting their ISP to kick them off.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The next step should be law enforcement: they can contact the service, and escalate to the judicial system if it refuses to act, which can decide whether to order the ISP to block the service, or close the company completely, or even jail the people behind it.

The ISP does never need to listen to, or even hear about, a problem with a service.

[–] greenskye@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This feels like shutting down road access to the local stripmall just because the bar there doesn't properly handle it's drunks. Oh and leaving that decision up to a private, not elected and not accountable citizen

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The only thing Yubo could/should have done is forward it to the police though (which is what the users that initially reported this content should have done as well, independently). I'm not sure why that hasn't happened. I hate to say it but this is still not the company's responsibility, the most they can do directly is ban his account which wouldn't accomplish anything in this case. I'd say go straight to local authorities rather than expecting services to handle it.