this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
80 points (92.6% liked)
movies
1776 readers
167 users here now
Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.
A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome
- Discussion threads to discuss about a specific movie or show
- Weekly threads: what have you been watching lately?
- Trailers
- Posters
- Retrospectives
- Should I watch?
Related communities:
Show communities:
Discussion communities:
RULES
Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.
Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the titleβs subject matter.
Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.
2024 discussion threads
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think it's like Avatar the Last Airbender, they don't want the movie being made without the original creators. The live action on Netflix did a great job with the mood of the locations and hiring the actors, everything else is pretty bad. They don't want to see all their work bastardized. I get it.
So... Mattel?
Did you see the movie? It wasn't really showing Mattel in the best light. I was surprised they let it go through.
Regardless, it's their IP, they can do what they want with it.
Avatar the Last Airbender was owned by Nickelodeon at the time of the movie, what's your point? The creators of the movie Barbie rebranded it to what made tons of money.
What's your point? Mattel owns Barbie, they get to decide what to do with it or not. Greta Gerwig and Margo Robbie do not own Barbie, they have no say in what happens with it.