this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
449 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59323 readers
5183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah I understand, but the trouble is it's not a totally unreasonable argument from their point of view. They are been asked to essentially put their seal of approval on something they have no real control over.

Perhaps the solution is to have some sort of agreement where any compromises that result from third-party ROMs, are not Google's responsibility and are they should be legally protected. I'm sure that the lawyers are the main reason for this position by Google.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

the thing is, even if they did cause issues, the seal means nothing, Google is going to deny all liability anyway. This is just Google being petty and blocking third party's imo