this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
61 points (91.8% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
262 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that the tax was designed to funnel money into the media oligopoly to which our politicians are beholden.

But like the headline, you are conflating the tax with the ban. They aren't two sides of the same coin, the ban (or maybe more accurately boycott) is a reaction to the tax.

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was it a tax? I thought the law simply required third parties to actually pay for reproducing the work of news outlets? Basically paying for paid work, rather than just stealing it?

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You're right I was duped by Google.