Politics

10180 readers

221 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kalanggam@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

JuBe@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

JCPhoenix@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

"Stop Sending Bombs”: U.S. Lawmaker Ilhan Omar Demands Israeli Arms Embargo (www.democracynow.org)

submitted 2 months ago by tardigrada@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Democratic U.S. Congressmember Ilhan Omar said outside the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on Wednesday [21 August], where members of the “uncommitted” movement launched a sit-in to demand a Palestinian American be allowed to address the convention from the main stage.

Omar said she joined protesters outside the DNC because “there is no compassion in turning our heads away from the piles of dead bodies” in Gaza. “A ceasefire is only possible if we use every leverage that we have, and the biggest leverage that we have is to stop sending bombs,” says Omar, explaining why she is calling for an arms embargo against Israel and an end to “this genocidal war.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes hamas, which was formed due to Israel then later funded by Israeli government, is worse than the country currently genociding the Palestinians...

[+] theVerdantOne@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would they attack USA?

Funny Israel has killed more Americans than hamas will and nothing changed.

[–] theVerdantOne@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hamas and their allies consider the U.S. as "Great Satan", basically their worst enemy. I doubt the punishment we gave to Al Qaeda is enough for them to step down.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

So you mean iran will attack USA if Israel is gone? Man wonder who helped make them hate us, like all the coups.

Do you think we punished al qaeda? Plus really should have gone after the Saudis

[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You know, Hamas is coming after the US next, and once they start attacking Americans, there’s no turning back.

This is a scary comment. The comment this was in response to indicated it was wrong to commit genocide on Palestinians. Instead of even making an attempt to redefine or minimize the genocide, this comment instead argued that the genocide would be functional. It is functional to commit genocide on Palestinian people to prevent "Hamas is coming after the US next." Nevermind that this doesn't even make sense to argue at all, just the fact that it was offered as a justification for genocide should create a moment of pause for anyone following along.