this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
58 points (98.3% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
393 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Universities

πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
58
Canadian rail decision is a win for companies, union leader says (www.reuters.com)
submitted 2 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He probably didn't say "and" If he did that it would be miss quoting which IMO is worse

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You're nitpicking. It's not a direct quote anyways; it's already paraphrased. They had no issue editorializing "them" to "companies", so adding an implied "and" wouldn't be any worse than that.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pot calling kettle black, I understood the title without the bloody and

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe I misunderstood your previous comment, because I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say here.

Are you saying my version of the title would have been fine without the "and" I added? I'm struggling to understand what you're taking issue with.