this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
540 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59664 readers
2757 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm rather curious to see how the EU's privacy laws are going to handle this.

(Original article is from Fortune, but Yahoo Finance doesn't have a paywall)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it's true. These AI models are not some big database where every piece of information is stored and can just be removed whenever you desire.

Imagine you almost got hit by a car while crossing the road as a child. That memory influenced your decisions from there on out, you learnt to always look before crossing, and over time your brain literally got wired differently because of that incident. Suddenly 20 years later the law requires you to remove that memory from your brain because apparently it was private data. How do you do that? It's not a single data point that just hangs around in your brain. Even if you could remove that memory, it still has compound effects on who you are and what you do. There is no removing that memory in such a way that all its effects on your brain are completely gone. It's exactly the same for these AI models. The way this one private data point affected the model parameters cannot be reverted unless you retrain the entire thing.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's true these models can't be reversed.

It's bullshit to claim that these models are the only way.

[–] regalia@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago

It's true, but it's also not an excuse. They broke the law because they were unlawfully collecting this data without explicit consent. They should absolutely be getting fucked for privacy violations.