Technology

59427 readers

2820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

609

Under Meredith Whittaker, Signal Is Out to Prove Surveillance Capitalism Wrong (www.wired.com)

submitted 2 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

164 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why isn't it on F-droid if it's FOSS?

That got me interested and apparently, they fear forks running out of date.

Concerning F-Droid, we already providing an auto-updating APK directly from our site, and we really don't want forked versions of the app maintained by other parties connecting to our servers. Not only could the users using the forked version have a subpar experience, but the people they're talking to (using official clients) could also have a subpar experience (for example, an official client could try to send a new kind of message that the fork, having fallen out of date, doesn't support). I know you say you'd advocate for a build expiry, but you know how things go. Of course you have our full support if you'd like to fork Signal, name it something else, and use your own servers.

While that statement got plenty of thumbs down, I hate to admit that F-Droid is indeed out of date quite often. I currently can't find a source for this but I once read this has something to do with their signing process.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, they manually sign every package.

But they could easily have their own F-Droid repository, I have repositories for FUTO apps like Grayjay and their keyboard, Bitwarden, and Newpipe, among others. Those are run by the projects themselves, so they're in charge of how often they update it, as well as how they sign it. So if they have issues with the "official" F-Droid repositories, they can always host their own. I honestly prefer projects that host their own repos precisely because they should, in theory, update faster.

That said, a self-updating APK is good enough for me. However, I didn't see an install option easily listed on their website and had to search for "signal android apk" to find the page. It should be listed on the regular install page on their website, next to the link to Google Play. I found three separate pages for getting it for Android, and all three had a link to Google Play and only one had the APK.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, ok, thanks. But I'm kind of tired of version churn: who needs to keep changing a chat program? IRC has been around since the 1980s or so and still works fine.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

who needs to keep changing a chat program? IRC has been around since the 1980s or so and still works fine.

some people like texting their family who doesn't use IRC, and they'd rather not send messages in plain text for one reason or another.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I get that IRC is old school and encryption is important. My question is why the program has to keep changing. If the task is simple enough, there shouldn't be incompatible changes required if there are new versions at all.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

With new possibilities due to new tech user demands rise, too. People asked for features like group or video chats or coupled devices (not trivial with E2EE) and since good companies listen, they developed those and still do.

Also, I don't think there's a single IRC client still in use that hasn't been updated since the 80s. I wouldn't be surprised if your favorite client got an update in the last couple of months - and that despite it being a trivial protocol.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://media.ccc.de/v/3e0a51f5-f60a-4a90-a78a-3a311c6ffe41 here the author explains why and it all sounds like a bucket of bullshit

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks, I might try to watch some of that.