Asklemmy

43912 readers

982 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

If the whole world went by, it takes a village to raise a child theorem and not the individual but the world as a whole. What would the world look like? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Much more confusion but also much less child abuse considering there are more filters for abuse-causing factors to have to go through.

I know a lot of victims of such calamity. "Oh don't worry I'll take care of it" says a single parent or pair of parents before going full good-for-nothing on them.

One can say what they want about sovereignty over their kin, but people are responsible for collateral damages too. As it stands, I wouldn't dare become a mom.