this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

AskBeehaw

2003 readers
2 users here now

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.

Subcommunity of Chat

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
thrawn21@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
UngodlyAudrey@beehaw.org
35
it's election season, Beehaw, so — what are your thoughts on compulsory (mandatory) voting? (beehaw.org)
submitted 2 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/askbeehaw@beehaw.org
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

good idea/bad idea, necessary democratic reform or authoritarian imposition? are there better or worse ways to do it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Mandatory voting, for people who have passed a morality test, and a competency test.

Nobody else is allowed to vote.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 13 points 2 months ago

for people who have passed a morality test

i don't see how this is even theoretically tenable considering what is "moral" is entirely subjective and largely nonfalsifiable

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You really don't want tests to prevent voting. They will be used entirely for voter supression.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah because there's definitely no voter suppression going on already. Let's make sure the dregs of society can share their dumbass opinions when things come to a general vote.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 8 points 2 months ago

That's a false equivalence. Building up society as a whole is better than trying to determine "the most relevant" voices.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

I suspect the people who would set this test would be the exact opposite of the people you want to set this test, in more than 50% of the seats.

[–] bronzle@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Oh, and a tax