this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
433 points (99.1% liked)

science

14791 readers
399 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

That doesn't sound like something we should be putting in our bodies then does it?

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, the article, or I should I say ads with writing in between, says"potentially non-toxic". Which I find to be a highly troublesome qualifier.

[–] bdot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

perhaps it’s worded that way for legal reasons? maybe if they flat out said it was non-toxic, and then it turned out that they were wrong, someone could sue them.

i am sure it’s the same sort of idea behind posting a video of someone committing a crime on camera, they use the word “allegedly”

dunno; not a lawyer

load more comments (3 replies)