this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
55 points (80.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43917 readers
1064 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wondering if Modern LLMs like GPT4, Claude Sonnet and llama 3 are closer to human intelligence or next word predictor. Also not sure if this graph is right way to visualize it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 41 points 1 month ago (11 children)

They’re still word predictors. That is literally how the technology works

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Yeah, the only question is whether human brains are also just that.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago (9 children)

no, they are not. try showing an ai a huge number of pictures of cars from the front. Then show them one car from the side, and ask them what it is.

Show a human one picture of a car from the front, then the one from the side and ask them what it is.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

lol, you got me, i definitely hadn't thought of that.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)