Linux

48186 readers

1873 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

102

Linux middle ground? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by Bunny19@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

However, manjaro places the button to enable it right next to enabling snaps and flatpaks. Both of which are perfectly safe to install if not safer than average packages.

The snap store has already been used to distribute malware, one guy lost a lot of money in crypto, and I'm sure it wasn't an isolated incident. I think it would be naive to think flathub isn't being targeted in the same way. Same advice as the aur, be cautious.

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sure, but that wasn't malicious code hacking your device just a simple phishing scheme. The aur runs arbitrary code each time which can do quite alot more on your system than any snap. That snap was just a fake app that sent your login to their server.

The aur is much more dangerous. Of course, when installing anything from anywhere be careful, but with the aur you need to be able to read the pkgbuild.

Thank you though for cautioning the snap store as you're right. Those apps aren't confirmed before they're placed on the store

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

It was still malicious code. A different attack for sure, but no less devastating for the victims.