this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
553 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

74754 readers
4107 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T156@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Would it not be possible to fake most of those by spoofing the model the CPU reports, like what happens with GPUs?

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I think this is the real danger. "I don't know why this i9 isn't performing like expected" is a problem where the cause may be much harder to trace if people can reliably change what the processor reports itself as. And even then, the question only even gets asked by those who actually benchmark it.

[–] BitingChaos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

With GPUs you can do things like dump its BIOS, alter the identification string, and then re-flash the card.

I've modified a lot of GPU BIOSes to tweak GPU and memory clock timings or enable Mac support.

CPUs aren't that easy to modify. I am not aware of any consumer tools that can simply re-write CPU's internal code.

Regardless, the first time you run a benchmark and it shows that your CPU is really X and not Y, you will know something is wrong.