this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
840 points (85.2% liked)

Antiwork

8259 readers
3 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

do you think it is possible to make a genuine choice under such coercion?

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that when you deny individuals agency by assuming they are brainwashed, then it's difficult to have democracy.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I think when you don't butter your bread, the sandwich tastes shit and dry

Now, are we finished making irrelevant statements?

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago

You should get a bread maker.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

i don’t see how this answers my question

[–] lemmington_steele@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and under which conditions can we even have genuine choice?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

in general, we can make genuine choice when we are presented with several good options and there's minimal pressure to choose a specific one. (i know the term "good" is vague, it depends on the specifics of the situation.) in the context of what we're talking about, a genuine choice could be made if people didn't depend on their job for housing, food, or healthcare.

it's not only about choosing between working and not working. it's also about giving people more flexibility to choose a job they would like to do. workers have much less control over their working conditions when they're effectively forced to always have a job.