this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
632 points (87.5% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3446 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 23 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trump

And it always has been.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Sometimes the Green Party protest vote is a vote for George H.W. Bush.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (12 children)

And George W. Bush.

And Donald Trump (the first time).

If the Green Party wasn't a thing, there would be a lot of elections that the Republicans wouldn't have won, because the margins were just that thin.

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's assuming green party voters would vote for the dems, which probably isn't the case. They'd be more likely to just not vote.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I agree with that estimation, but even then I'd say that the majority of Green Party voters who would decide to vote anyways would probably vote Dem over GOP, and that still matters.

Because only one of those parties is trying to deny me basic human rights, I can't say I'm sympathetic to anyone who would choose not to vote out of spite just because they don't personally have as much at stake.

[–] eacapesamsara@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You must not have been alive in the 90s or 00s if you think Dems wouldnt and dont want to deny your basic human rights

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I remember when the Dems repealed roe v Wade.

Oh wait that was trump and the GOP. My mistake.

I was definitely there when the dems tried to ban music based on it's offensive nature.

Oh wait that was Reagan and the GOP. My mistake.

I was there when the Dems banned foreign travelers based on nationality.

Oh wait that was trump and the GOP. My mistake.

[–] eacapesamsara@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago

Neither Dems nor the GOP did the first one, Dems did fail to ever codify the right to privacy or bodily autonomy though, despite every legal scholar for 50 years saying roe was a Shakey decision.

The second one never happened, unless you're confused by just the general existence of the FCC with your half remembered fantasy, and yes, I do remember when Dems fully supported banning travellers based on nationality, Biden cowrote that bill.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

That could mean that 60% of the US leans green.

Or they're just apathetic and attaching a social meaning to their apathy feels good.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)