this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
81 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
235 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo was visiting China earlier this week, a sea-green Chinese smartphone was quietly launched online.

It was no normal gadget. And its launch has sparked hushed concern in Washington that U.S. sanctions have failed to prevent China from making a key technological advance. Such a development would seem to fulfill warnings from U.S. chipmakers that sanctions wouldn’t stop China, but would spur it to redouble efforts to build alternatives to U.S. technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's absolutely bizarre that you grouped Taiwan and China together in this sentiment.

Taiwan being a silicon powerhouse is literally part of a deliberate strategy by western nations, especially the US, to combat Chinese manufacturing. They were supplied with science and technology. They have the license agreements. They're one of the cadre of nations that are currently waving protectionist flags against the "threat" of Chinese manufacturing.

It'd be like putting the Dutch in the list. Except even weirder, because there is not any semblance of abnormal diplomacy/hostility between Amsterdam and Beijing.

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you don't believe that Communist China could possibly get away with espionage against ethinic and cultural Chinese Taiwan?

Interesting.

You also don't appear to consider the clear intention of Communist China's plans to annex Taiwan.

Also interesting. Do you know the history behind the creation of Taiwan? If there was a "clear plan", I would say it was ill conceived.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you legitimately saying that we should treat Taiwan as the same as China just because its citizens are the same race? Jesus fucking christ, dude. Take a deep breath, look in the mirror, and reconsider that racist ass position.

Straight up Tankie shit, the rest.

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, but the fact you think that is telling. I'm saying it's a wholevlot easier for Chinese to spy on Chinese. Just like it's easier for Americans to spy on Americans.

How did you come to the conclusion I'm Communist out of that? Again, your assumptions are telling. Spend some time with a mirror.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, who else does that logic apply to? We should treat South Korea the same as DPRK because they're all Korean, right? It's easy for Koreans to spy on other Koreans since they're all the same. And DPRK intends to one day annex South Korea! Ditto for Ukraine and Russia. I bet we can do a lot of these, where we racially categorize nations based on western cultural ideas that have nothing to do with local political conditions and declare them to be the same.

Fuck allll the way off you fucking racist fuck.

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Are straw men all you have? When did I say we should treat Taiwan the same as China? I said they are the same culture and history. The same situation exists for Korea.

Anyway, you are just looking for a fight, so I'm disengaging since nothing I say will change your understanding of what I said.