this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
141 points (90.8% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3383 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Every election is the least bad option every time. Anyone who thinks different lives in a fantasy world. Real life always disappoints.

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is genocide, not just healthcare policy or something

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Centrists successfully fought against the public option but refuse to oppose genocide.

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I also particularly enjoy the insinuation that expecting a candidate to oppose or at least not actively support genocide is "living in a fantasy world."

I remember back not that long ago when any democrat would have proudly told you that they would never support genocide under any circumstances. For some of them it turns out there's a clause of "unless our ally is doing it and there's an election coming up"

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, they would have told you that. But when it came down to it they'd prevaricate and allow it. Just like drone strikes. Or the Iraq War, which most of the Democrats supported.

I'm not happy about it, but reality has disappointed me way, way too many times to expect anything better.

The fact that we need a government at all is a failure of our species IMHO. We can't be trusted not to be assholes.

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Agree 100%. It's sad

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This is America. Genocide has been our policy for hundreds of years.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its going to take hundreds of elections to vote your way away from the genocide country, founded by genocide, built by genocide and stopping them from participating in genocide. You'd have to run the pro genocide people out of every dime they have by supporting their opponents. And they're spending money to defeat democrats right now.

A general strike could do it sooner, but it would be brutal, painful and require a level of solidarity above and beyond lecturing people on an online forum