this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
27 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

1374 readers
120 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Verizon Communications, AT&T and Lumen Technologies are among the telecoms companies whose networks were breached by the recently discovered intrusion, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] engelsaxons@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well you know the old saying: "If you can't trust VOA, America's official propaganda arm, then who can you trust?"

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If only it was true. Sadly, the source is Reuters, not VOA.

[–] engelsaxons@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes VOA, which is what is linked to, does say the source is Reuters, which I'm sure we've both noticed is not the WSJ that Reuters refers to in the article, which would be the primary source of this information ostensibly.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Half the news networks republishes Reuters content. Instead of using Reuters link, I used VOA, since they don't break embedded metadata. The content is identical. If you had an issue with the content or primary source, that would have been one thing, but instead you had to showcase your ignorance, or alternatively you deliberately tried to inflame a controversy out of nothing.

[–] engelsaxons@hexbear.net -1 points 1 month ago

but instead you had to showcase your ignorance, or alternatively you deliberately tried to inflame a controversy out of nothing.

very-intelligent