this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
360 points (97.9% liked)

Work Reform

10000 readers
541 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But knowing how shitty companies are they'll likely make some excuse to fire people before they get close to their 6 year maximum. It's similar to how fast food places avoid hiring someone full time by scheduling them for 35 hours a week instead of 40.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That happens at McDonald's. It never happens at strong union jobs. You fire a union worker, it has to be well documented, by the book, and for a damned good reason. There's no chance of getting fired for bullshit reasons in something like a dock workers union. You also won't be getting reduced hours.

[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know unions, my dad was a union VP for over a decade. I've seen how companies can be shitty even if you have the union backing you.

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My wife worked at a grocery store and as i heard their union boss golfed with the CEO of the grocery chain… as i understand it that was HR masquerading as a union, by the time she left it sure was acting the part too

[–] Lux18@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Wait so any new hires after this deal was made would not be included? Wouldn't new hires also be in the union?

That would seem like a pretty big deal if true.