this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers
356 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
75
UK’s £22 Billion Carbon Capture Pledge Follows Surge in Lobbying by Fossil Fuel Industry: Scope of corporate influence underscores how the technology will prolong demand for planet-heating methane gas (www.desmog.com)
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it definitely won't meaningfully change the need to drastically reduce the amount of carbon being emitted

You're right, but this is also the problem. These oil and gas companies are spending so much on lobbying so they can limp along with lines like:

"We'll be clean as soon as someone else figures out carbon sequestration"

It's plastic "recycling" all over again. Yes we do need to spend money on studying these types of solutions, but we need to be VERY careful about letting very powerful industries abuse the system and gaslight their way into continued pollution.

Articles like this are an important reminder - if the major oil lobbyists see this as a good thing, we need to be asking why.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Absolutely agree.