Politics

10181 readers

99 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kalanggam@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

JuBe@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

JCPhoenix@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Supreme Court declines Biden administration appeal in Texas emergency abortion case (apnews.com)

submitted 1 month ago by FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a decision barring emergency abortions that violate the law in Texas, which has one of the country’s strictest abortion bans.

The justices did not detail their reasoning for keeping in place a lower court order that said hospitals cannot be required to provide pregnancy terminations if they would break Texas law. There were no publicly noted dissents.

The decision comes weeks before a presidential election where abortion has been a key issue after the high court’s 2022 decision overturning the nationwide right to abortion.

The justices rebuffed a Biden administration push to throw out the lower court order. The administration argues that under federal law hospitals must perform abortions if needed in cases where a pregnant patient’s health or life is at serious risk, even in states where it’s banned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

Okay, Obama didn't have the benefit of future knowledge that Roe v Wade would be struck down. It was a precedent that had stood the test of time across decades.

Why the Dems didn't do it for the very short time they had both chambers under Biden, I don't know. Perhaps they had a naive belief that Conservatives wouldn't be the trolls they are.

But even if we assume they won't do anything about it again, which I seriously doubt based on how popular abortion access has become—even if we assume that, abortion isn't the only thing on the ballot, and people are voting en masse for the Democrats, because LGBTQ rights, environmental protections, and even American democracy itself is at stake.

To cast aspersions and wring hands over abortion when we're 30 days away from the election...I just don't get how that helps anyone. The die has been cast. Holding onto some vain hope that neither Democrats nor Republicans will win (or worse, that everything will burn down in some bloody revolution) is madness.