this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
758 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59358 readers
4278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What exactly does Apple have a monopoly over? Or Amazon? Both have plenty of competition, while, let's be honest, Google cornered a segment the market really well with Search + Chrome. Google is basically dictating direction of Web based standards towards an ad-driven, zero-privacy, centralized internet.

If anything, after Google it should be Microsoft again.

[–] firadin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 8 points 1 month ago

Prime video should also have to sink or swim on its own.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Something you should keep in mind is that being a monopoly is not illegal, and it never has been. If you make a great widget and, through honest competition, corner that widget market, that's perfectly legal.

What ISN'T legal is using your market power to engage in anti-competitive behavior. It's not illegal for Apple to dominate the phone market. It is likely illegal for Apple to use its dominance of the phone market to prohibit competing app stores from being installed on their phones. That is Apple operating in two distinct businesses - a phone manufacturer and a software retailer. Apple is using its market dominance as a phone manufacturer to gain an unfair advantage as a software retailer.

This is a pretty damning violation of federal antitrust law.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't see Amazon as a monopoly, but as far as Apple goes, they currently hold the majority of phone sales in the US. A big reason for that is that they have a history of artificially preventing you from using certain device features with non-Apple products or services. iMessage is a good example as it took an order from China for Apple to add the RCS messaging standard that Android phones have had for years. Another example is that, while music apps on Android can use Google Assistant features, only Apple Music can utilize Siri features on iOS.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Nah, Amazon intentionally monitors its sellers, outbuys them, undersells the sellers until they disappear, then sell higher. They also contractually forbid them from selling lower on other sites.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Sounds like regulations are in order, yes. EU (and ironically China) doing the good work. But it's hardly a monopoly. They just have a successful product, like it or not.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Again? I guess I missed Microsoft being impacted in any way. 🤔

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

They've creeped back from another angle after IE was killed.