politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I'm just posting this article that’s already available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy—I didn’t write it, just sharing it for discussion.
If you disagree with the article, that's fine, but calling for it to be censored or accusing me of pushing an agenda just because I'm posting it or it’s not what you want to read is misguided. Open debate needs different perspectives, not censorship.
I’m clarifying all of this due to past posters refusing to refrain from personal attacks and insults, as well as repeated baseless accusations that I’m a Republican, Russian, and/or that I'm not even an American citizen. And one poster has been repeating over and over that I'm not even human (?!).
So I'd prefer we stick to discussing the article’s politics rather than focusing on me personally, if you'd like to engage with me. Now if you wanna just talk crap about me but not talk to me, then feel free. But I don't really think that fits in with the spirit of this awesome community.
I’m not here to prove anything to you. I’ll keep posting content that fits the community’s guidelines, and if you feel otherwise, the mods are available. Thank you!
you don’t believe you have an agenda of increasing support for third parties to “fight against the two-party duopoly”?
No, because this is Lemmy. You guys freakin' hate third parties. lmao
What on earth makes you think that anyone on Lemmy is gonna change their mind? Look at the replies. You've noted the hate and how I’m one of the few standing up for third parties.
There is no one here to convert. I have some supporters interested in the articles and I'm glad they have something to read, but they’re already third-party people. It’s the same as all the pro-Harris posts in this sub. No one’s switching to Harris because of those posts — people post them because they like the content, and others who share their views enjoy reading them.
It’s the same concept. Not everything has to be a grand agenda. I find these articles interesting, so I post them.
I also post a ton of Neanderthal and paleoanthropology articles in the science sub. Do you think I’m trying to change people’s minds about Neanderthals? No, I just find it interesting, and others who do will read them.
I’m not clever enough for some grand scheme. In fact, you yourself implied just how little cleverness I have. :)
I'm famous! Lol yeah dude if you're gonna copy paste robotic sounding text, you might get three whole comments pointing it out. So mysterious, I am. Thank you!!
As I’ve mentioned several times, I believe we should focus on discussing the content of the articles posted from here on out, in order to keep with the spirit of this community. Thank you!
As I've mentioned several times before, writing the exact same message over and over is odd. Please focus on writing unique messages. Thank you!
Thanks, but you are still not talking about the specific content of the article. I believe we should focus on discussing the content of the articles posted from here on out, in order to keep with the spirit of this community. Thank you!
As I’ve mentioned several times before, writing the exact same message over and over is odd. Please focus on writing unique messages. Thank you!
You're still not talking about the content of the article, so it seems obvious you don't understand the message. Let's stay focused on the content of the article especially since you’ve had some comments removed for personal attacks already today. Thank you!
As I’ve mentioned several times before, writing the exact same message over and over is odd. Please focus on writing unique messages. Thank you!
You're still not talking about the article contents. Please stick to the article. Thank you!