this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
38 points (91.3% liked)

Gaming

2488 readers
207 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

But removing Denuvo DRM after 12 weeks ‘causes zero mean total revenue loss.’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

As much as people don't want to hear this, it's a case of the Berlin Wall.

EVERYBODY hated the Berlin wall. If the soviets wanted East Germans to stay in their hypothetical borders, then they should make living environments that encourage people to WANT to be there.

Except they didn't. They built a wall, and made it impossible to pass. And guess what? The amount of people leaving their country went from an alarming high number of escapees, to near zero. It may have been unpopular, but it was effective.

Now, with the DRM. If they can make an effective DRM that kills piracy, they'll make more money by preventing piracy than they'll lose from non-sales protests.

Unpopular, but effective. That's their logic. And the amount of people not buying in protest is miniscule.

It's like me protesting the Cleveland Browns until 2027. I don't appriciate a rapist being on our team. However, everybody else wants him to have a great season. They still spend their money on NFL packages, and go to games, and buy merch. ME not spending a dime in protest only works if the majority do it as well. Which isn't the case, sadly.

So until the majority protest DRM games, the DRM will be unpopular, but effective.