-3
Jill Stein slams ‘attack dog’ AOC after ‘predatory’ comments: ‘Democrats are running scared’
(www.washingtonexaminer.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
-3 points (0.0% liked)
politics
19043 readers
3811 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The fact that Harris has lost the Muslim vote, a sector she can't win without. That's the bed Democrats made, hope it's comfortable for them
LOLOL. Where in the hell are you getting your polling stats and facts from, Jill Stein herself, or the UbërKüül "Anti-Establishment News/Zone".
The Muslim population in the US is 1%. They could sit this out and nobody would notice. 🤣
You're also attempting to speak for "the entire" Muslim population because of your stance on Palestine, but newsflash, plenty of the Muslim population couldn't give two shits about Palestine, and absolutely fucking hate Hamas for having gotten innocent civilians into the mess they are in now. Source: I live in an urban area with a high density Muslim population who is all about Harris/Walz, and thinks you're just making some shit up to make yourself feel better.
From the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Your antidotal evidence is meaningless when the numbers tell a different story.
Wow...do you math?
So 30% of the 1% population segment of the US is for Jill Stein.
OH NO...what will the Democrats ever do....
How could Harris possibly go on to win without those hundreds of votes.
Edit: let me go deeper for you on this since you can't use functional math.
Let's say 3M Muslim voters in the US, and 30% (according to that link you sent) vote for Harris, 30% for Stein, and 40% for Trump (lulz not likely.
So then you take that 3M number and divide by population centers they live in. Let's just divide it up evenly across 50 states to be favorable for your argument even though that's not how that works, but whatever.
60k votes per state spread across districts, and we have..... zero impact at all in the national polling numbers for Harris.
So, no. You thinking the Muslim vote for Harris is needed is absolutely wrong. Fact of the matter s that's not where this segment lives at all. The more concentrated groups are in Urban areas of solidly Blue states Trump can't win anyway, and that's all Harris cares about. You think they don't do this math? 🤣
They live where it matters, swing states. The places where Harris is tied with trump
But they don't: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States#By_state
Man, you must feel pretty bad realizing your entire bullish stance on this is complete bullshit. I'm lolling super hard at your "Dems made their bed and have to sleep in it" comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦
DNC by the numbers 2020
Georgia won by 11k votes - has 120k Muslims
Arizona won by 10k votes - has 109k Muslims
Wisconsin won by 20k votes - has 68k Muslims
Pennsylvania won by 80k votes - has 150k Muslims
Michigan won by 150k votes - has 241k Muslims
Again you can't math, AND you aren't even aware of what states Stein is on ballot for, then you're assuming the entire Muslim population is voting.
The national polling is between Trump and Harris. Harris has the edge. 1% of any population isn't going to affect that.
Even if only half the Muslim vote that voted for Biden in 2020 votes for a third party in those swing states, Harris will lose.
No, because your poll already said 30% of that same number is voting Harris, and Trump is only 10% because he is so disliked. Stein isn't on the ballot in any of the deciding swing states, so again...does not matter. The Muslim population is not large enough to matter.
She is on every swing state ballot And Georgia has recently been added
Uh oh: https://www.rgj.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/09/06/nevada-supreme-court-rules-green-party-ineligible-for-general-election/75109795007/
You're wrong again
Brought to you by the party that claims that they're going to protect democracy, so we need to vote for them. The best they can do is sue to keep threats to their power off of the ballot.
Wow, you might want to tell her Campaign that then: https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
AGAIN. MATH.
Regardless of Stein. Regardless of the Muslim 1%. Regardless of any of the other bullshit you keep trying to bring up, the concentration in numbers DOES NOT MATTER.
The problem with people who are cocky and trying to influence something they have zero power to influence is that they are so fucking sure of themselves that they can't be wrong.
You are wrong.
I cant help it if you cant read maps. The dark solid green is where Jill And other Green Party members are on the ballot. The lighter green is where only Jill is on the ballot.