If you saw why people would criticise it then you’d… edit the post, recapture the graph with an accurate visual representation including the zero on the Y axis?

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago

Well...

that's how the website displayed the graph when I took that screenshot, I'm pretty sure you can't modify the axis
I'm not on my computer at the moment, editing is the most I can do right now
if you can capture the graph with 0 on the Y axis, please post it below and I'll update the picture

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Or just inform the other adults to consult the axis for clarification.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the only way to demonstrate the fall, of you did it at scale it would've even be noticeable.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are people here who didn't even notice the axis and are confused. How do you expect everyone to notice a 5% drop lol.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well if they didn't even notice an axis on a graph, they might be too stupid for a graph...

My point was only to say that 5% is very mich visible on a 0-100% graph.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

My point is that it is hardly visible and doesn't show the exact numbers properly. I prefer the current style of graph for showing sudden changes if the previous data points isn't that important in the context. But everyone has their preference I suppose.