this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
723 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The election is in three weeks, and Pennsylvania is a must-win state for both Trump and Kamala Harris, but during a rally last night in Montgomery County, northwest of Philadelphia, Trump got bored with the event, billed as a “town hall,” and just played music for almost 40 minutes, scowling, smirking, and swaying onstage. Trump is no stranger to surreal moments, yet this was one of the oddest of his political career.

This kind of behavior would have resulted in discussion of dementia and Alzheimers if it was a Democrat.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There was absolutely nothing in this town hall to indicate an issue with his mental acuity that has not already been known. He has always been an idiot. This is not news.

Clooney put a hit out on Biden for much less.

But the point is to report on this in the hopes that the American people will pay attention. I can only speculate why you want to keep a lid on it...

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ugh worst Batman

Val tho… beautiful.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Clooney was an excellent Bruce though.

But yeah. Kilmer and Conroy are the only actors who have managed to do justice to both. Greenwood and Oswald have given amazing performances but really can only do one half.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m such a slut for Batman Forever… cheesy fun amazing movie where my beautiful Val and Jim KILLED IT

also my brain randomly just thinks “BLAAAST HIIIM” and “WHYYY WON’T YOU DIIIIIIE?!”

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Forever retroactively got shit on because of And Robin and later the Nolan movies. I think it was very flawed but it was a perfect movie for the TAS era in terms of tone.

That said, what makes me laugh the most are the people who pretend the friggin Burton Batmans are deeply dark and serious. They were camp as all hell and fun for it.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Pay attention to what?? The stuff we’ve all lived through for the last ~~five~~ ten years??

This report is bullshit. It’s an illustration of the demise of the media and real journalism. It’s misinformation to solidify a narrative.

I know. Most people don’t care about policy - most notability DT. I understand that clicks aren’t gained through real journalism. This is exactly how we ended up with this dickhole to begin with. Every media outlet flooded their blocks with every minute story they could drum up about Trump. This left little time to cover any other alternative candidate. Everyone is obsessed with loving or hating this guy. WTF are we doing? No one is changing their mind about him at this point. How, I don’t know. How the fuck any living human could possibly consider this shitstain for anything more than a janitor is beyond me.

The point is that these stories are misleading. It doesn’t matter what you think about the person or the outlet doing the reporting. We should be more critical of the truth and the mistruths we’re being fed. Had anyone successfully made this argument in 2015, perhaps we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We ended up with this monster because news outlets were actively protecting him because he was good for ratings.

The sanewashing is finally coming to an end and people who don't follow politics will hear about this.

But that is apparently bad in your eyes. Well, we can probably guess who's eyes but...

As for nobody changing their minds? Multiple republicans openly support Kamala. The fucking KKK put in for.. jill Stein. Minds are changing. So stop actively fighting against sanity.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When polls are indicating that half of the United States of America are planning to vote for - THIS GUY - I don't think minds are changing at all.

I would respectfully submit that you also are suffering from delusions.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago

How dare you accuse GP of delusions! Unless you're one of the........

[–] doc@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think we're at a boy who cries wolf point. News pieces like this are almost a daily occurrence. Those who don't care won't simply because it happens again. If anything it will further galvanize their resistance.

There's a sense that these things must be reported and recorded for reasons of history, but for whatever effect one would like to happen as a result it is probably useless.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are a daily occurrence because there is finally corporate pushback against the sanewashing that has occurred for years.

But hey. Nobody should talk about how mentally unstable a candidate is, right? I really hope you are getting paid for this.

[–] doc@fedia.io -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been hearing it for over 8 years now, to varrying degrees of intensity across the media spectrum. I'd assume anyone else paying even the least amount of attention has, too.

Yet here we are at a 48% split with 3 weeks to go.

So yeah, keep reporting. Maybe that fraction of a percent will make the difference; it's close enough that it could! But don't hold your breath, and don't keep beating on the same horse as if doing so will make a difference.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am smart and anyone who is smart won't be affected by anti trump reporting so nobody should even try and we should sane wash comrade putins best asset again

You should be ashamed of yourself

[–] doc@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Brilliant being combative with strangers in the same echo chamber as you. Glad we spent this time together.