this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
188 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
5216 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
188
The War on Passwords Is One Step Closer to Being Over (www.wired.com)
submitted 2 months ago by GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“Passkeys,” the secure authentication mechanism built to replace passwords, are getting more portable and easier for organizations to implement thanks to new initiatives the FIDO Alliance announced on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No. Wtf no.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

well they deliver your mail. I am envisioning the same protections but also you don't have to use it in general. but it would be how the government would send things to you.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

based on?

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You'll need to read the article I don't feel like breaking it down for you.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Im familiar with the concept and disagree. Just giving you a chance to back it up. You see anything can be called a false equivalency and each specific equivalency would have specifics on why.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Buddy. If you're not able to tie in the conversation to the concept I can't help. I recommended pasting the concept into an LLM to explain it to you.

Or if you're looking to argue with a stranger on the internet... I can't help you there either.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't need it as its not a false equivalency.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ okay chief