this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
366 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4001 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] b3an@lemmy.world 33 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I tried to find a copy of the interview, but it was just edits. Cut edits. When she says or he says. Another trick of Fox to obfuscate and make it seem one way than another. Just break it up and put it out of context.

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] b3an@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you @RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world, I appreciate you dropping that link here. Wow.. it's been two minutes and I'm already taken aback here.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It gets better. It takes her a minute to realize exactly how much of a partisan hack he's trying to be.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I did watch it. Wow. He seemed almost apologetic at the end but, idk. He was an asshole as a ‘journalist’. She came with good receipts, and didn’t allow herself to be strung along. Smart!

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm hoping it was ridiculous enough that a few Fox News viewers will recognize exactly how hard Fox is putting their thumb on the scale.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you give too much credit, but, as an American with hope for reason and sanity, I’ll continue to try and hope for the lost of us too.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

If it hits one in two hundred viewers, that moves the needle. It doesn't take much.

[–] oaklandnative@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't watched it yet but it looks like this might be the full interview:

https://youtu.be/OtQ1ksG7Uug?si=i6rGcz7BpmVd5XDN

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Nah, that's another cut up with very little of the interview