this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
1093 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
59402 readers
3333 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A victim could also stay in their house, never go outside, never talk to anyone to further limit a stalker's access. But they shouldn't have to let a stalker turn their life into an isolated prison.
Blocking people from viewing their account was one tool that was available, and now it's not. People are saying they still want access to that tool and are unhappy it was taken away.
Not sure you're intending to but you're putting a lot of onus on the victim to address the behavior of bad actors.
Women don't want to deal with men who would sexually assault them? Stop wearing "provocative" clothes and going to bars.
Kid doesn't want to get bullied at school? Stop being "weird".
Don't want to be stalked? Stay away from public forums.
These are not solutions, these are ways to put responsibility for bad crimes onto the victims instead of the perpetrators.
Threat actor can create another account to easily circumvent what ever this "measure" is.
Also how did blocking somebody you don't like online turned to SA situation, y'all sure love to escalate with idiotic analogies.