Technology

59427 readers

4429 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

818

Server dealer keeps hitting at Elon Musk for $61 million bill — Wiwynn sues X for unpaid IT infrastructure products (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s hard to understand regardless what their experience with billing terms may be.

“Don’t give them credit” still makes sense to me as someone who has that experience. It also makes sense to me as just a normal human that maybe we shouldn’t just let unreliable parties pay later given their wild (basically public at this point) history with paying people.

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Did you even read the article...?

Because if you had, you would know that the credit terms were established prior to Musk's takeover.