this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
626 points (87.4% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because they aren't focused on just one single service. Bitwarden is a single business only focusing on their password manager, whereas proton has a suite of tools. Passwords need to be stored absolutely in a robust and safe way. I don't trust proton with anything at all, and the proton pass is no exception. The client might be open source, but the backend is not. It's also not as mature as bitwarden.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

These are valid points. There are many password managers, most of which it wouldn't take much to poke holes in, especially if open source is a main criteria.

What are some that you would consider with Bitwarden now being off the table?

[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago